Skip to content

MoreCoffee

Because one is not enough

Menu
  • About Me
  • Flood Checks
  • Mobile Comms
    • EDGE
      • Cell Selection and Reselection
      • Dedicated PDCH
      • EDGE Chapter Summary and Key Points
      • General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)
      • GPRS Air Interface
      • GPRS IP Connectivity
      • GPRS Logical Channels
      • GPRS Support Node (GSN)
      • High Speed Circuit Switched Data (HSCSD)
      • Interconnection Principles
      • Master PDCH
      • On Demand Dedicated PDCH
      • PDCH Allocation
      • PDP Context Activation and Deactivation
      • System Overview
      • The users IP communication
      • Traffic Case – GPRS Attach
      • Traffic Case – IMSI Attach
      • Traffic Case Combined GPRS/IMSI Attach
    • GSM (Groupe SpĂ©ciale Mobile)
      • GSM Bearer Services
      • GSM Cell Handover
      • GSM Encryption
      • GSM Localisation and Calling
      • GSM Logical Channels and Frame Hierarchy
      • GSM Mobile Services
      • GSM Network and Switching SubSysetm
      • GSM Operation SubSystem
      • GSM Protocols
      • GSM Radio Air Interface
      • GSM Radio SubSystem (RSS)
      • GSM Security
      • GSM Subscriber Authentication
      • GSM Summary & Key Points
      • GSM System Architecture
      • GSM Tele Services
      • Supplementary Services
    • Historical Background
    • Introduction
  • News
    • Daily Digest
  • Quick Links
    • php info
    • Test MP4 demo
    • Weather
Menu

GSM Cell Handover

GSM systems require a procedure known as a Handover to maintain the continuity of the call. This is because a single cell does not cover the whole service area e.g. a whole city or country. However a single cell has a maximum service area of approximately 23 miles (35 km) for each antenna (Tripathi, et al. 1998). The smaller the size of the cell and the faster the movement of the MS through the cells (Up to 155 mph (250 kph) for GSM), the more handovers of ongoing calls are required, but a handover should not cause the a call drop. Basically there are two main reasons for handovers, however the GSM Specification identifies 40 reasons.

The MS moves out of coverage of the serving BTS thus the signal level becomes lower continuously until it falls beneath the minimal requirements for communications. Or the error rate may grow due to interference, the distance to the BTS may be do high. All these effects may diminish the quality of the radio link and make transmission impossible in the near future.
The wired infrastructure i.e. the MSC, BSC may decide that the traffic in one cell is too high thus introducing congestion and hence decides to shift some MSs to other cells with a lower level of traffic, if that is possible. Thus, handovers can be used as a method of controlling traffic through load balancing to relieve localised congestion.

Figure 11 shows four possible handover scenarios with in the GSM system.

Figure 11 Types of handover within a GSM system
Figure 11 Types of handover within a GSM system

 

  1. Intra Cell Handover : This happens when within a cell, when narrowband interference could make transmission at a certain frequency impossible. The BSC could then decide to change the carrier frequency. (1)
  2. Inter Cell, intra BSC handover : This type of handover is a typical handover within the GSM system and occurs when the MS moves from one BTS to another but stays within the control of same BSC. The BSC performs the handover and assigns a new radio channel in the new BTS, then releases the old BTS. (2)
  3. Inter BSC, Intra MSC handover : Since a BSC controls a limited number of BTSs, the GSM system has to perform handovers between BSCs. This form of handover is controlled by the MSC. (3)
  4. Inter MSC handover : A handover could also be required between two BTSs that belong to two different MSCs, now both MSCs perform the handover together.(4)

In order to provide all the information necessary for a handover due to a weak link, the MS and the BSC both perform periodic measurements of the downlink and the uplink quality respectively. The link quality measurement is made up from receive signal level (RxLev) and the bit error rate (BER) and form part of the layer 3 messaging function. Measurement reports are sent by the MS about every 0.5 seconds and these contain the quality of the current link used for transmission as well as the quality of certain channels in neighbouring cells (the BCCHs).

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Floating in February
  • Distinctly Damp Diglis & more
  • Up and about Ketch 4th January 2024
  • Eggardon Hill, Dorset. 2nd December 2023
  • Out of the Mist

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • April 2024
  • July 2023
  • April 2023
  • January 2023
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • October 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2015
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • February 2010
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • December 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • March 2007
  • November 2006

Categories

  • Affiliates
  • Agile
  • Blogroll
  • Cakes
  • Cloud
  • Dedicated Hosting
  • Deserts
  • domains
  • Drone Flight
  • e-commerce
  • General
  • Hosting
  • Humor
  • MBA
  • Online Gaming
  • Photo Blog
  • Photography
  • Rant
  • Recipe
  • Scam
  • Servers
  • Swifts
  • Technical
  • Uncategorized
  • Webhosting
  • Floating in February
  • Distinctly Damp Diglis & more
  • Up and about Ketch 4th January 2024
  • Eggardon Hill, Dorset. 2nd December 2023
  • Out of the Mist
  • Affiliates
  • Agile
  • Blogroll
  • Cakes
  • Cloud
  • Dedicated Hosting
  • Deserts
  • domains
  • Drone Flight
  • e-commerce
  • General
  • Hosting
  • Humor
  • MBA
  • Online Gaming
  • Photo Blog
  • Photography
  • Rant
  • Recipe
  • Scam
  • Servers
  • Swifts
  • Technical
  • Uncategorized
  • Webhosting
© 2025 MoreCoffee | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
%d